In this
maritime action, the appellate court held that plaintiff’s counsel was properly
disqualified since he had previously worked as an adjuster who had access to
confidential information regarding the defendant cruise line.
Valsecchi v.
Proprietors Insurance Co., 502 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1987).
The appellate court
found that the "law of the case" doctrine–which bars reconsideration of points
of law which were, or should have been, adjudicated in a former appeal of the
same case–prevented the plaintiffs from relitigating the choice-of-law
questions.
W. J. v. State,
406 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
The appellate court
reversed the trial court’s finding that a juvenile was a delinquent because the
evidence did not establish that he was guilty of theft, since the victim was
unable to identify the juvenile and there was no evidence to show he committed
any act to aid in the offense.
Arkwright-Boston
Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dunkel, 363 So.
2d 190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
In this coverage case
involving a mentally-ill brother fatally shooting his sister and wounding his
niece, the appellate court held that an allegedly insane individual does not
possess the requisite capacity to act "intentionally" within the framework of an
"intentional injury exclusion clause" thereby giving rise to coverage.